Game Theory and Partnership in Child Protection Practice
- ISSN: 09503153
- DOI: 10.1080/0950315042000306651
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to highlight one of the contradictions between the main English government guidance for child protection practiceWorking Together to Safeguard Children (1999), compared with the official published guidance on assessment practice: the Framework for Assessing Children in Need and their Families (2000). The contradiction refers to radically different models of decision that lie deep at the heart of both sets of guidance. This contradiction is examined in terms of a review of research on partnership, the decision theory literature, and particularly, game-theory analysis, together with research on personal influence and how partnerships may best be effected. The paper argues that the Working Together model is strongly risk adverse and is in stark contrast with the Framework model that is consistent with other published mainstream risk decision models. The upshot of official practice in adopting such a harsh risk decision model is the alienation of service users who are subject to the scrutiny of authorities responsible for public care. This bodes ill for the concept of partnership, which is the key concept of social work practice, not only in child protection, but in all main areas of social care. An alternative perspective of the child protection process is offered with some applicability to other areas of social care practice and which aims to be less threatening and to encourage inclusiveness of service users.
Sign up today - FREE
Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more
- All your research in one place
- Add and import papers easily
- Access it anywhere, anytime