Genetic variation in the vitamin D receptor gene and vitamin D serum levels in Egyptian women with polycystic ovary syndrome

53Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Obesity, insulin resistance, and hyperandrogenism are considered crucial parameters of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) which might be related to vitamin D metabolism. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between polymorphisms (TaqI and ApaI) in the vitamin D receptor gene (VDR) and PCOS among Egyptian women. We aimed also to elucidate the impact of these polymorphisms on vitamin D level, hormonal and metabolic parameters of PCOS. One hundred and fifty Egyptian women with PCOS and 150 unrelated controls were enrolled in this study. Polymorphisms of VDR Taq-I T/C (rs731236) and Apa-I A/C (rs7975232) gene were genotyped using polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Serum 25 hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH) D] levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. PCOS women had significantly lower levels of 25(OH) D compared to healthy women. Our results revealed that Taq-I CC genotype and C allele were associated with increased risk of PCOS, while the Apa-I polymorphism was not. Haplotype Taq-I C/Apa-I C was associated with a higher PCOS risk more than controls. Moreover, there was a significant decrease of 25(OH) D levels in carriers of haplotype Taq-I C/Apa-I C (with variant alleles) compared to the noncarriers. Results showed also that there was an obesity-VDR Taq-I genotypes interactions. These results suggested that, VDR Taq-I gene polymorphism is associated with increased risk of PCOS in Egyptian women. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

El-Shal, A. S., Shalaby, S. M., Aly, N. M., Rashad, N. M., & Abdelaziz, A. M. (2013). Genetic variation in the vitamin D receptor gene and vitamin D serum levels in Egyptian women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Molecular Biology Reports, 40(11), 6063–6073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-013-2716-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free