The ghosts of HeLa: How cell line misidentification contaminates the scientific literature

100Citations
Citations of this article
240Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While problems with cell line misidentification have been known for decades, an unknown number of published papers remains in circulation reporting on the wrong cells without warning or correction. Here we attempt to make a conservative estimate of this ‘contaminated’ literature. We found 32,755 articles reporting on research with misidentified cells, in turn cited by an estimated half a million other papers. The contamination of the literature is not decreasing over time and is anything but restricted to countries in the periphery of global science. The decades-old and often contentious attempts to stop misidentification of cell lines have proven to be insufficient. The contamination of the literature calls for a fair and reasonable notification system, warning users and readers to interpret these papers with appropriate care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Horbach, S. P. J. M., & Halffman, W. (2017). The ghosts of HeLa: How cell line misidentification contaminates the scientific literature. PLoS ONE, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186281

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free