Sign up & Download
Sign in

Giving Farmers a Voice

by Tapan S Parikh
(2009)

Cite this document (BETA)

Page 1
hidden

Giving Farmers a Voice

Giving Farmers a Voice
Tapan S. Parikh • parikh@berkeley.edu
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 2
hidden
Agriculture and Development

The majority of the world’s poor make
their living from agriculture

Improving productivity and profitability is
the main pathway for development of the
poorest countries (WDR 2008)

Doing this efficiently can reduce natural
resource consumption and impact
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 3
hidden
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 4
hidden
Farmers Need Information

Knowledge about inputs

Dealing with pests and diseases

New practices, technologies

Access to markets, buyers

Transportation

Weather forecasts

Access to capital
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 5
hidden
Challenges

Access to technology

Infrastructure (power, connectivity)

Education and literacy

Social, economic, cultural, linguistic
and institutional gaps
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 6
hidden
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 7
hidden
Mobiles and Voice

Mobile phones are rapidly reducing the
physical limitations of access

However, information must still be usable,
trusted and relevant

Voice-based content can be accessed, and
created, by farmers with low-cost handsets
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 8
hidden
•Hisaab - UI Design for Microfinance

Avaaj Otalo - Farmer to Farmer
Knowledge Sharing

Digital ICS - Quality Control and
Communication for Cooperatives
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 9
hidden
Hisaab
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 10
hidden
Microfinance

Provision of financial services to under-
served communities

Organized into groups that decide who
gets loans, monitor repayments, and
maintain accounts

Poor records (due to lack of literacy and
training) limit performance, complexity of
products and access to capital
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 11
hidden
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 12
hidden
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 13
hidden
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 14
hidden
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 15
hidden
Design for Low-literacy

Leverage existing representations

Use icons that are familiar and realistic

Provide guidance throughout the task

Numbers are more accessible then text

Local language audio is very important
w/ HFI, CCD, Media Lab Asia
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 16
hidden
Orality (Ong, 1982)

Oral communities have their own ways of
representing and managing information

Aggregative - tolerant of repetition,
redundancy and inconsistency

Situational - tied to specific situations and
people; not abstract concepts

Dialectic - reinforced by dialogue
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 17
hidden
Avaaj Otalo
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 18
hidden
Neil Patel
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 19
hidden
•Farmers have many questions

Treating specific pests?

Amount, type of inputs to use?

Extension programs are costly, but still don’t
reach most farmers

Difficult to contextualize knowledge

Only accessible resource is local input dealer
Agricultural Extension
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 20
hidden
Avaaj Otalo

Farmers and experts call an IVR-based
voice system to:

record questions

provide answers

review previous questions and answers

Popular questions broadcast on radio

Early days of Usenet; using Voice
w/ Neil Patel, IBM, DSC
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 21
hidden
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 22
hidden
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 23
hidden
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 24
hidden
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 25
hidden
Current Results

Pilot with 50 users since December 2008

Averaging 1000 calls per month

One farmer self-reported a $6K increase in
income due to information from AO!

Questions covered a variety of topics
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 26
hidden
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 27
hidden
Major Findings

Numeric input was more intuitive, less error-prone
then limited vocabulary speech recognition

Farmers preferred expert advice, but also learned
from questions and experiences of other farmers

Farmers patiently waited through (and even
enjoyed) lots of irrelevant (free) content

Lots of uses for voice forum, both for farming, and
for non-farming activities
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 28
hidden
Orality (Ong, 1982)

Oral communities have their own ways of
representing and managing information

Aggregative - tolerant of repetition,
redundancy and inconsistency

Situational - tied to specific situations and
people; not abstract concepts

Dialectic - reinforced by dialogue
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 29
hidden
Digital ICS
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 30
hidden
Yael
Schwartzman
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 31
hidden
•Internal control system for agri-cooperatives

Maintain quality, certifications (organic, fair trade)‏

Voice feedback and questions from farmers
Inspectors use
mobile phones
to monitor farms
Evaluators use a
web application
to give feedback
Generate reports
for extension and
certification
Inspection Evaluation Report Generation
w/ Yael Schwartzman, CEPCO, Asobagri
Digital ICS
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 32
hidden
Current Results

Deployed in a Mexican coffee cooperative
with over 2700 farmers

More efficient reporting, decision-making

$10,000 yearly savings for cooperative

Voice feedback used to target extension,
governance, allocation of premiums

Service contract established
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 33
hidden
• Trace coffee to parcel

Growing history

Farmer’s stories

Two-way communications
Digital ICS: Producer-2-Consumer
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 34
hidden
Giving Farmers a Voice

Rural communities want to be heard!

Using text and forms is like “threading an
elephant through the eye of a needle”

Voice is a much better medium for
expression and engagement

Voice not only useful for interacting with
information, but for aggregating and
representing information itself
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 35
hidden
Future Research

What is the best way to organize
information for oral users?

Can we efficiently index, search and
browse user-generated voice content?

Can we use collected voice data to
improve speech recognition?

What is the impact of such technologies,
and can we use voice to document it?
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 36
hidden
Conclusions

Tools for people to help themselves

Empowering institutions

Cooperatives, NGOs, farmer networks

Models can be transferred

Improving feedback

Peer-to-peer sharing
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 37
hidden
Other Projects

CommCare - Mobile Tool for CHWs

Surveys, Clinical Protocols

Mobile MIS for SHGs

Improving Data Entry using ML

Voice-based Data Collection

OpenRosa - Mobile Data Collection
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 38
hidden
Discussion

Can these models be applied to

Improve the accountability of public
programs?

Engage rural communities in
discussions about climate change and
environmental issues?

Disseminate and discuss other kinds of
information?
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 39
hidden
Thanks!

Kaushik Ghosh, Apala Chavan, Sarit Arora,
Puneet Syal, Neil Patel, Yael Schwartzman,
Yaw Anokwa, Kuang Chen, Brian DeRenzi,
Kurtis Heimerl, Neha Kumar

CCD, Asobagri, CEPCO, DSC, Media Lab
Asia, HFI, IBM Research India

Intel, Microsoft, Nokia, Unamesa, Transfair,
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 40
hidden
E-Z Rural Computing
Easy to Use: Max outreach
Easy to Teach: Word of mouth
Easy to Access: Travel is hard
Easy to Share: Amortize high costs
Easy to Create: Local ownership
Easy to Adapt: Localization essential
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 41
hidden
Internal Control

Certification (organic, fair trade, etc.) and
quality can allow small farmers to earn
price premiums

Cooperatives use Internal Control Systems to
ensure farmers are following best practices

Internal control, certification and
responding to farmers’ needs are labor,
feedback and data-intensive
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 42
hidden
Digital ICS

Management, monitoring and quality
control tool for agricultural cooperatives

Field staff use mobile phones to document

Compliance with organic requirements

Farmers’ questions and feedback
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 43
hidden
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 44
hidden
Digital ICS
Cooperative’s field
staff use mobile
phones to document

Organic certification

Growing practices

Farm parcels

Equipment

Neighboring crops

Substances used

Questions and comments
Inspection Evaluation Report Generation
w/ Yael Schwartzman, CEPCO
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 45
hidden
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 46
hidden
Evaluators use
web application
to review data,
provide feedback
and follow-up
Digital ICS
Inspection Evaluation Report Generation
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 47
hidden
Reports for:

Buyers

External certifiers

Internal records

Decision-making

Extension follow-up
Digital ICS
Inspection Evaluation Report Generation
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Page 48
hidden
• Honey Bee shares grassroots knowledge and innovation
• Publishes 7 regional magazines about agricultural practices
and other innovations
• Interested in new ways to share content and facilitate
communication between innovators
• Developed multi-media distributed database and
communications application
• Networked using asynchronous CD-based updates
• Implemented at kiosks in Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh,
Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu
Knownet-Grin
Knowledge Network for Grassroot Innovators: A Honey Bee Project
Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in

Readership Statistics

8 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
by Academic Status
 
50% Ph.D. Student
 
25% Other Professional
 
13% Student (Bachelor)
by Country
 
75% United States
 
13% South Africa

Groups

IMTFI Library