Sign up & Download
Sign in

for Free Giving Knowledge for Free

by T H E Emergence, O F Open, Educational Resources
Knowledge Creation Diffusion Utilization (2007)

Abstract

An apparently extraordinary trend is emerging. Although learning resources are often considered as key intellectual property in a competitive higher education world, more and more institutions and individuals are sharing digital learning resources over the Internet openly and without cost, as open educational resources (OER). This study, which builds on previous OECD work on e-learning, asks why this is happening, who is involved and what the most important implications are. Higher education is facing a number of challenges: globalisation, an aging society, growing competition between higher educational institutions both nationally and internationally, and rapid technological development. OER is itself one of these challenges, but may also be a sound strategy for individual institutions to meet them. The trend towards sharing software programmes (open source software) and research outcomes (open access publishing) is already so strong that it is generally thought of as a movement. It is now complemented by the trend towards sharing learning resources the open educational resources movement. The reports title, Giving Knowledge for Free, reveals the potential implications of the OER movement. OER is not only a fascinating technological development and potentially a major educational tool. It accelerates the blurring of formal and informal learning, and of educational and broader cultural activities. It raises basic philosophical issues to do with the nature of ownership, with the validation of knowledge and with concepts such as altruism and collective goods. It reaches into issues of property and its distribution across the globe. It offers the prospect of a radically new approach to the sharing of knowledge, at a time when effective use of knowledge is seen more and more as the key to economic success, for both individuals and nations. How paradoxical this may turn out to be, and the form it will eventually take are entirely unforeseeable. The report offers some preliminary handles for understanding the issues raised. OER projects can expand access to learning for everyone, but most of all for nontraditional groups of students, and thus widen participation in higher education. They can be an efficient way of promoting lifelong learning, both for individuals and for government, and can bridge the gap between non-formal, informal and formal learning.

Cite this document (BETA)

Available from www.oecd.org
Page 1
hidden

for Free Giving Knowledge for Free

11
Giving Knowledge for Free

The Emergence of Open Educational
Resources
Francesc Pedró
OECD Centre for Educational Research and Innovation
2
The paradox of OER
 Growing competition
– knowledge and learning resources are often
considered as key intellectual property
 But
– HE institutions and individuals are sharing their digital
learning resources over the Internet openly and for
free
 OECD/CERI and Hewlett Foundation study:
– why is this happening?
– who is involved?
– what are the implications of this?
3
Giving knowledge… for free?
free downloadable pdf file
www.oecd.org/edu/oer
• or
printed version, 24€
Page 2
hidden
24
Contents
 What are OER?
 What issues are posed to HE institutions?
 What are the policy implications?
5
Content
Materials published for
learning or reference
Learning Reference
Collections
• UTOPIA
• Library of
Congress
• Internet
Archive
• Google Scholar
• Wikis
• PLoS and
other open
journals
Courseware
• MIT OCW
• JHSPH OCW
• Notre Dame
• Tufts OCW
• UMich OCW
• Utah St. OCW
• Sofia
Learning
Objects
• Rice
Connexions
• Merlot
• UC-Berkeley
videos
Development
Tools
• Rice
Connexions
Groupware
• H20 (at
Harvard)
• Wikis
• USU’s OSLO
research
Content
Management
Systems (CMS)
• USU’s
EduCommons
Tools
Software for development
and delivery of resources
Licensing Tools
• Creative
Commons
Best Practices
• CMU (design
principles)
Interopability
• OKI
• IMS
Standards
Shared conventions for
digital publishing of open
resources
Learning
Management
Systems (LMS)
• Sakai
• Moodle
 Teaching, learning and research resources, that:
– reside in the public domain, or
– have been released under open licenses
6
Type of content produced
Part of courses
Full courses
Learning objects
23%
41%
36%
Type of content used in own teaching
Parts of courses
Full courses
Other
Learning objects
41%
6%
15%
38%
Page 3
hidden
37
8
Institution Community
OER Providers
Big
Small
Wikipedia
MIT OCW
MERLOT
Open Course
Univ. of the
Western Cape
Connexions
OpenLearn
ParisTech Common Content
9
A grass-root movement
• Few institutional
initiatives, unless
financed externally
• Low institutional
awareness
• Enthusiasts and
evangelists:
– Mostly, with no support
– Users are producers
Support from management
To a great extent
Not at all
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Use of Content Production of
Content
Use of OSS Production of OSS
Page 4
hidden
410
Three issues
 Will HE lose registered students?
 Why should HE engage in OER?
 What are the challenges posed by OER?
11
Will HE lose registered students?
 The profile of OER learners:
– According to MIT and Tufts, users of OER are typically:
• well educated (with bachelors or masters degree)
• self-learners (MIT 47%, Tufts 43%)
• from North America (although 57% were non-US visits)
– John Hopkins OER also reports large numbers of
professionals and self-learners
 The market value of accredited programs (and
certificates)
 The added value of institutionalised tutoring
 … and the relevance of the marketing perspective!
12
Motivations for producing and sharing open educational resources
Governments Institutions Individuals
Expanded access to
learning
Mission: a redefinition of what
public service is and how to
deliver it
Altruistic or community
supportive reasons
Bridge the gap between
non-formal, informal and
formal learning
Leverage on taxpayers’ money by
allowing free sharing and
reuse between institutions
Personal non-monetary gain
Promote lifelong learning “What you give, you receive back
improved”
Commercial reasons
Good PR and show-window
attracting new students
It is not worth the effort to keep
the resource closed
Growing competition – new cost
recovery models are needed
Stimulate internal improvement,
innovation and reuse
Underlying Drivers and Inhibitors of technical, economic, social and legal nature
Page 5
hidden
513
Main issues according to IIPE
UNESCO Forum
14
Main Challenges for the OER movement
 Quality and relevance of resources
 Intellectual Property Rights
 Sustainability – more than economics, but
important to find a good revenue model
15
Policy implications at institutional level
 Increased competition among HEI
 Increased comparison of courses, syllabuses, reading
lists, contents, etc among HEI
 There is a risk in doing nothing
– IT strategy including OA and OER
– Incentives for faculty members to use and produce
OER
– Training and support for development and use of OER
and particularly copyright issues
Page 6
hidden
616
Policy implications at national and
international level
 National level
– A way to promote lifelong learning, wider participation
in higher education and bridge gap between informal
and formal learning
– Holistic approach to digital learning resources
– Review existing copyright regime
– Open publication of publicly funded resources
 International level
– Interoperability
– Building a knowledge base for the OER movement
– Awareness raising activities
17
New wine in old bottles?
18
Thank you!
Francesc.PEDRO@oecd.org
http://www.oecd.org/edu/oer

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in

Readership Statistics

42 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
 
by Academic Status
 
33% Ph.D. Student
 
14% Researcher (at an Academic Institution)
 
7% Researcher (at a non-Academic Institution)
by Country
 
21% United Kingdom
 
14% United States
 
5% Brazil

Tags