Groupthink: How Should Clinicians Respond to Human Trafficking?

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

© 2017 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Human trafficking is a pervasive problem that exceeds the capacity of social and organizational resources to restrain and for which guidelines are inadequate to assist medical professionals in responding to the special needs of victims when they present as patients. One obstacle to appropriate disagreement with an inadequate status quo is the lure of group cohesion. "Groupthink" is a social psychological phenomenon in which presumed group consensus prevails despite potentially adverse consequences. In the context of the medical response to human trafficking, groupthink may foster complacency, rationalize acquiescence with inaction on the basis of perceived futility, create an illusion of unanimity, and accommodate negative stereotyping. Despite these inhibiting influences, even in apparently futile situations, medical professionals have unique opportunities to be a force for good.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Groupthink: How Should Clinicians Respond to Human Trafficking? (2017). AMA Journal of Ethics, 19(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.1.msoc3-1701

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free