Sign up & Download
Sign in

Habermas and Foucault: thinkers for civil society?

by Bent Flyvbjerg
British Journal of Sociology (1998)

Abstract

Taken together, the works of Jürgen Habermas and Michel Foucault highlight an essential tension in modernity. This is the tension between the normative and the real, between what should be done and what is actually done. Understanding this tension is crucial to understanding modern democracy, what it is and what it could be. It has been argued that an effective way of making democracy stronger is to strengthen civil society. This article contains a comparative analysis of the central ideas of Habermas and Foucault as they pertain to the question of democracy and civil society. More specifically, the discourse ethics of Habermas is contrasted with the power analytics and ethics of Foucault evaluating their usefulness for those interested in understanding, and bringing about, democratic social change.

Cite this document (BETA)

Available from www.jstor.org
Page 1
hidden

Habermas and Foucault: thinkers for civil society?


Page 2
hidden

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in

Readership Statistics

43 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
 
by Academic Status
 
49% Ph.D. Student
 
19% Student (Master)
 
7% Other Professional
by Country
 
21% United Kingdom
 
19% United States
 
9% Germany