HIV treatment as prevention: The utility and limitations of ecological observation

53Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Results from several observational studies of HIV-discordant couples and a randomized controlled trial (HIV Prevention Trials Network 052) show that antiretroviral therapy (ART) can greatly reduce heterosexual HIV transmission in stable HIV-discordant couples. However, such data do not prove that ART will reduce HIV incidence at the population level. Observational investigations using ecological measures have been used to support the implementation of HIV treatment for the specific purpose of preventing transmission at the population level. Many of these studies note ecological associations between measures of increased ART uptake and decreased HIV transmission. Given the urgency of implementing HIV prevention measures, ecological studies must de facto be used to inform current strategies. However, the hypothesis that widespread ART can eliminate HIV infection may have raised expectations beyond what we may be able to achieve. Here we review and discuss the construct of the exposure and outcome measures and analysis methods used in ecological studies. By examining the strengths and weaknesses of ecological analyses, we aim to aid understanding of the findings from these studies to inform future policy decisions regarding the use of ART for HIV prevention. © 2012 Smith et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, M. K., Powers, K. A., Muessig, K. E., Miller, W. C., & Cohen, M. S. (2012, July). HIV treatment as prevention: The utility and limitations of ecological observation. PLoS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001260

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free