The importance of physician climate advocacy in the face of political denial

6Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Most physicians accept the general scientific discoveries about anthropogenic global warming and its dangers. Occasional denial by individual physicians of climate change can be readily answered by reference to the scientific consensus. But widespread, organized, political denial of climate change is hazardous to physicians’ advocacy for an effective public health and health care response to climate change. This article assumes that physician climate advocacy is ethical and celebrates the many forms of health climate advocacy already under way. It concludes by drawing attention to measures that can scale up and strengthen the health care system’s organized response to growing climate health hazards.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jameton, A. (2017, December 1). The importance of physician climate advocacy in the face of political denial. AMA Journal of Ethics. American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.12.sect1-1712

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free