The Incompatibility of Anti-Individualism and Privileged Access

Abstract

Discusses how M. McKinsey's (see record 1998-06467-006) argument regarding individualism and privileged access can be applied not only to T. Burge's (see record 1998-06467-001) anti-individualism, but to any form of anti-individualism. The author addresses how the argument applies to the claim that what natural kind concepts a S has depends on his natural and/or social environment, and to the claim that what non-natural kind concepts a S has depends on his social environment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)