InnovationXchange: A case study in innovation intermediation

24Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Knowledge intermediation can create otherwise unobtainable value when potentially profitable knowledge combinations do not occur because the search costs required to discover them are too high and/or the risks and costs of opportunistic behavior prevents the knowledge disclosure required to identify and/or pursue them. Based on a case study of the Australian operation of the InnovationXchange (IXC), an innovation intermediary, this paper identifies three sets of core intermediation competences - network spanning capability, organizational memory and credibility and skills as a mediator. It describes the practices employed by IXC to develop and sustain these capabilities, enabling it to (1) search for and match partners and facilitate knowledge sharing across geographical, industry and disciplinary boundaries at lower cost and more effectively than its clients can do on their own, and to (2) mitigate risks of opportunistic behavior, IP contamination and reputational damage that prevent agents from engaging in direct contact. © 2011 eContent Management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Håkanson, L., Caessens, P., & MacAulay, S. (2011). InnovationXchange: A case study in innovation intermediation. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 13(2), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2011.13.2.261

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free