Insuring Care: Paperwork, Insurance Rules, and Clinical Labor at a U.S. Transgender Clinic

19Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

What is a clinician to do when people needing medical care do not have access to consistent or sufficient health insurance coverage and cannot pay for care privately? Analyzing ethnographically how clinicians at a university-based transgender clinic in the United States responded to this challenge, I examine the U.S. health insurance system, insurance paperwork, and administrative procedures that shape transgender care delivery. To buffer the impact of the system’s failure to provide sufficient health insurance coverage for transgender care, clinicians blended administrative routines with psychological therapy, counseled people’s minds and finances, and leveraged the prestige of their clinic in attempts to create space for gender nonconforming embodiments in gender conservative insurance policies. My analysis demonstrates that in a market-based health insurance system with multiple payers and gender binary insurance rules, health care may be unaffordable, or remain financially challenging, even for transgender people with health insurance. Moreover, insurance carriers’ “reliance” on clinicians’ insurance-related labor is problematic as it exacerbates existing insurance barriers to the accessibility and affordability of transgender care and obscures the workings of a financial payment model that prioritizes economic expediency over gender nonconforming health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Eijk, M. (2017). Insuring Care: Paperwork, Insurance Rules, and Clinical Labor at a U.S. Transgender Clinic. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 41(4), 590–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-017-9529-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free