Intakes of heme iron and zinc and colorectal cancer incidence: A meta-Analysis of prospective studies

65Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background Epidemiologic findings concerning the associations between intakes of heme iron and zinc and colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence yielded conflicting results. We aimed to investigate the associations by performing a meta-Analysis of prospective studies. Methods We conducted a literature search on PubMed and EMBASE databases up to December 2012 to identify the prospective studies that investigated the relationships between heme iron or zinc intake and risk of CRC. We also reviewed the bibliographies of the retrieved articles to identify additional studies. We used a random-effects model to calculate the summary relative risks (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Results Eight studies on heme iron intake and six studies on zinc intake met the inclusion criteria. The summary RR of CRC for the highest versus the lowest intake was 1.14 (95 % CI = 1.04-1.24) for heme iron and 0.83 (95 % CI = 0.72-0.94) for zinc, respectively. The observed associations were not significantly modified by subsites within the colorectum, sex, geographic area, study duration, the number of cases, or the range of intakes. In the dose-response analyses, the summary RR of CRC was 1.11 (95 % CI = 1.03-1.18) for heme iron intake of 1 mg/day, and 0.86 (95 % CI = 0.78-0.96) for zinc intake of 5 mg/day, respectively. There was little evidence of publication bias. Conclusion This meta-Analysis suggests a significant positive dose-response association of heme iron intake and a significant inverse dose-response association of zinc intake with risk of CRC. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qiao, L., & Feng, Y. (2013). Intakes of heme iron and zinc and colorectal cancer incidence: A meta-Analysis of prospective studies. Cancer Causes and Control, 24(6), 1175–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-013-0197-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free