Integration vs. interface.

ISSN: 10403973
0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To conclude, system interfaces and system integration have specific uses based on the individual hospital's assessment of current and future needs. For the short-term, interfaces can provide a level of increased functionality without the upheaval of current operations. On the long-term considerations, the cost may factor negatively against the hospital's long-term information requirements and its inability to move and adapt quickly as the healthcare environment changes. Integrated systems, while requiring conversion from current interfaced systems, provide the functions and flexibility that serve a hospital's immediate and long-term information needs and enable it to survive in an increasingly-volatile healthcare environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bodenbender, J. (1989). Integration vs. interface. U.S. Healthcare, 6(6), 22–23, 26.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free