Interval type–2 defuzzification using uncertainty weights

7Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

One of the most popular interval type–2 defuzzification methods is the Karnik–Mendel (KM) algorithm. Nie and Tan (NT) have proposed an approximation of the KM method that converts the interval type–2 membership functions to a single type–1 membership function by averaging the upper and lower memberships, and then applies a type–1 centroid defuzzification. In this paper we propose a modification of the NT algorithm which takes into account the uncertainty of the (interval type–2) memberships. We call this method the uncertainty weight (UW) method. Extensive numerical experiments motivated by typical fuzzy controller scenarios compare the KM, NT, and UW methods. The experiments show that (i) in many cases NT can be considered a good approximation of KM with much lower computational complexity, but not for highly unbalanced uncertainties, and (ii) UW yields more reasonable results than KM and NT if more certain decision alternatives should obtain a larger weight than more uncertain alternatives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Runkler, T. A., Coupland, S., John, R., & Chen, C. (2018). Interval type–2 defuzzification using uncertainty weights. In Studies in Computational Intelligence (Vol. 739, pp. 47–59). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67789-7_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free