Sign up & Download
Sign in

Intraoperative facial motor evoked potential monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation during skull base surgery.

by Charles C J Dong, David B Macdonald, Ryojo Akagami, Brian Westerberg, Ahmed Alkhani, Imad Kanaan, Maher Hassounah
Clinical Neurophysiology (2005)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To address the limitations of standard electromyography (EMG) facial nerve monitoring techniques by exploring the novel application of multi-pulse transcranial electrical stimulation (mpTES) to myogenic facial motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. METHODS: In 76 patients undergoing skull base surgery, mpTES was delivered through electrodes 1cm anterior to C1 and C2 (M1-M2), C3 and C4 (M3-M4) or C3 or C4 and Cz (M3/M4-Mz), with the anode contralateral to the operative side. Facial MEPs were monitored from the orbicularis oris muscle on the operative side. Distal facial nerve excitation was excluded by the absence of single pulse responses and by onset latency consistent with a central origin. RESULTS: M3/M4-Mz mpTES (n=50) reliably produced facial MEPs while M1-M2 (n=18) or M3-M4 (n=8) stimulation produced 6 technical failures. Facial MEPs could be successfully monitored in 21 of 22 patients whose proximal facial nerves were inaccessible to direct stimulation. Using 50, 35 and 0% of baseline amplitude criteria, significant facial deficits were predicted with a sensitivity/specificity of 1.00/0.88, 0.91/0.97 and 0.64/1.00, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Facial MEPs can provide an ongoing surgeon-independent assessment of facial nerve function and predict facial nerve outcome with sufficiently useful accuracy. SIGNIFICANCE: This method substantially improves facial nerve monitoring during skull base surgery.

Cite this document (BETA)

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in

Readership Statistics

5 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
 
by Academic Status
 
40% Researcher (at an Academic Institution)
 
20% Other Professional
 
20% Ph.D. Student
by Country
 
20% United Kingdom
 
20% Hong Kong
 
20% Unspecified