Introduction

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In 2005, I observed 20 prenatal genetic counseling sessions at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. With each patient’s permission, I sat as a student observer in a small patient education room listening and watching the conversations that unfolded between the genetic counselors, patients, and family members. The sessions usually involved a pregnant woman who had been referred for amniocentesis either because she was of advanced maternal age (AMA) or because a screening test indicated she was in a high-risk group for having a child with a chromosomal abnormality. Initially, what attracted me to this area of research was the ethical complexity of decision making in pregnancies diagnosed with genetic abnormalities, but my observations confronted me with the equally complex phenomena of communicating about genetics. The interest in comparing and contrasting the styles of four different genetic counselors prompted the research question that guides this project: What are and what should be the dominant model(s) of communication between genetic counselors and patients?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fanning, J. B. (2016). Introduction. In Philosophy and Medicine (Vol. 124, pp. 1–8). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44929-6_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free