Sign up & Download
Sign in

Investigating relationships between aerosol optical depth and cloud fraction using satellite, aerosol reanalysis and general circulation model data

by B. S. Grandey, P. Stier, T. M. Wagner
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics ()

Abstract

Strong positive relationships between cloud fraction (f(c)) and aerosol optical depth (tau) have been reported. Data retrieved from the {MODerate} resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer ({MODIS)} instrument show positive f(c)-tau relationships across most of the globe. A global mean f(c) increase of approximately 0.2 between low and high tau conditions is found for both ocean and land. However, these relationships are not necessarily due to cloud-aerosol interactions. Using state-of-the-art Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate ({MACC)} reanalysis-forecast tau data, which should be less affected by retrieval artefacts, it is demonstrated that a large part of the observed f(c)-tau signal may be due to cloud contamination of satellite-retrieved tau. For longer {MACC} forecast time steps of 24 h, which likely contain less cloud contamination, some negative f(c)-tau relationships are found. The global mean f(c) increase between low and high tau conditions is reduced to 0.1, suggesting that cloud contamination may account for approximately one half of the satellite-retrieved increase in f(c). {ECHAM5-HAM} general circulation model ({GCM)} simulations further demonstrate that positive f(c)-tau relationships may arise due to covariation with relative humidity. Widespread negative simulated f(c)-tau relationships in the tropics are shown to arise due to scavenging of aerosol by convective precipitation. Wet scavenging events are likely poorly sampled in satellite-retrieved data, because the properties of aerosol below clouds cannot be retrieved. Quantifying the role of wet scavenging, and assessing {GCM} representations of this important process, remains a challenge for future observational studies of aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions.

Cite this document (BETA)

Authors on Mendeley

Readership Statistics

17 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
 
by Academic Status
 
29% Post Doc
 
24% Ph.D. Student
 
18% Student (Master)
by Country
 
18% United Kingdom
 
6% Germany
 
6% Brazil

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in