An investigation into the cultural equivalence of self-monitoring scales using multi-group mean and covariance structure analysis

  • FUNAKOSHI R
  • TASAKI K
  • SHIOMURA K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present study investigated the cultural equivalence of Self-Monitoring Scales (Snyder, 1974) through an examination of differential item functioning (DIF) using structural equation modeling. The data were collected in Japan (n=211) and the US (n=171). Factorial analyses were conducted on three factors of Self-Monitoring Scales: Extraversion, Other-Directedness, and Acting. DIF analyses were then conducted between the Japan and US data on five items in Extraversion, four items in Other-Directedness, and four items in Acting. The results showed that partial factorial invariance was confirmed in both the Extraversion and Acting factors, and strong factorial invariance was detected in the Other-Directedness factor; therefore, each factor of the Self-Monitoring Scales showed reasonable evidence for their cultural equivalence. Based on the results of the DIF analyses and factor mean comparisons between the Japan and US data, the cross-cultural validity of these scales was discussed.View full abstract

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

FUNAKOSHI, R., TASAKI, K., & SHIOMURA, K. (2013). An investigation into the cultural equivalence of self-monitoring scales using multi-group mean and covariance structure analysis. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 28(3), 180-188.0.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free