The Left Vienna Circle, Part 1. Carnap, Neurath, and the Left Vienna Circle thesis

19Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recent scholarship resuscitates the history and philosophy of a 'left wing' in the Vienna Circle, offering a counterhistory to the conventional image of analytic philosophy as politically conformist. This paper disputes the historical claim that early logical empiricists developed a political philosophy of science. Though some individuals in the Vienna Circle, including Rudolf Carnap and Otto Neurath, believed strongly in the importance of science to social progress, they did not construct a political philosophy of science. Both Carnap and Neurath were committed to forms of political neutralism that run strongly against a political reading of their logical empiricism. In addition, Carnap and Neurath sharply differ on precisely the subject of the place of politics in logical empiricism, throwing into question the construct of the 'Left Vienna Circle' as a coherent, sociohistorical, programmatic unit within the Vienna Circle. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Richardson, S. S. (2009). The Left Vienna Circle, Part 1. Carnap, Neurath, and the Left Vienna Circle thesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 40(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.12.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free