Life Sciences for Philosophers and Philosophy for Life Scientists: What Should We Teach?

7Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Following recent debate on the relations between philosophy of science and the sciences, we wish to draw attention to some actual ways of training both young philosophers of science and young life scientists and clinicians. First, we recall a successful case of training philosophers of the life sciences in a strictly scientific environment. Second, after a brief review of the reasons why life scientists and clinicians are currently asking for more ethics, more methodology of science, and more philosophy of science in the training of life scientists and clinicians, we present two training models that could spur the discussion on how to meet the requests coming from the scientific community. We argue that in order to reflect on mutual relations between philosophy of science and the sciences and to foster proper interactions, issues regarding (1) the topics considered, (2) the features of educational curricula, and (3) the institutional organizations should be addressed jointly.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boniolo, G., & Campaner, R. (2020). Life Sciences for Philosophers and Philosophy for Life Scientists: What Should We Teach? Biological Theory, 15(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00333-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free