Maximal isometric handgrip strength: Comparison between weight categories and classificatory table for adult judo athletes

29Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare the maximal isometric handgrip strength of judo athletes from different weight categories and to create a classificatory table for this test. A total of 406 athletes had their maxi-mal isometric handgrip strength measured, following standardized rec-ommendations. Absolute and relative values were calculated for each hand and for the sum of both hands. Weight categories were compared through a one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey test. The ef-fect size was determined by partial eta squared, and the relationship between variables was determined using Pearson correlation coeffi-cient. There was a large effect of weight category in absolute handgrip strength for each hand and for the sum of both hands, with lower values for the lighter categories. Conversely, when the relative strength was considered higher values were found for the lighter categories (P < 0.001). Very large and significant positive correlations (P < 0.001) were found between right and left for absolute (r=0.886) and relative (r=0.883) handgrip values. Overall, there was an increase in absolute and a decrease in relative handgrip strength across weight categories. These differences found in grip strength in weight categories are prob-ably linked to differences in muscle mass between them. There was a high correlation between each hand for absolute and relative values, which suggests that assessing only one hand may be enough, and therefore a faster way of evaluation. Finally, the normative classificatory table created may serve as a reference for different purposes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Franchini, E., Schwartz, J., & Takito, M. Y. (2018). Maximal isometric handgrip strength: Comparison between weight categories and classificatory table for adult judo athletes. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation, 14(6), 968–973. https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.1836396.198

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free