Meta-Analysis and Systematic Reviews: Aggregating Research Results

  • Drisko J
  • Grady M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The recent trend toward evidence-based practice has transformed the helping professions, social work among them. Recent books on EBP, however, have been geared more toward the social work research community than to the frontline practitioner seeking clinical knowledge. Evidence-Based Practice in Clinical Social Work fills this gap, presenting EBP as both an effective approach to social work and a broader social movement. This practical volume takes readers through the EBP decision-making process in assessment, treatment planning, and evaluation, providing guidelines for making relevant use of research findings. This practice-building reference: introduces core principles of EBP and details its processes in social work; provides examples of meta-analysis and systematic reviews; features guidelines for engaging clients in EBP, including transmitting research findings; addresses education and supervision issues, and ongoing controversies; and includes a glossary and useful appendices. Clinical social work professionals and educators as well as policymakers will look to Evidence-Based Practice in Clinical Social Work as a resource that broadens the field and expands the healing possibilities for the profession. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Drisko, J. W., & Grady, M. D. (2012). Meta-Analysis and Systematic Reviews: Aggregating Research Results. In Evidence-Based Practice in Clinical Social Work (pp. 137–153). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3470-2_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free