When militias provide welfare: Lessons from Pakistan and Nigeria

3Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

MANY GROUPS ASPIRE TO GOVERN TERRITORY, but few actually followed through with it to the extent that the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) had. In addition to the brutal executions and disfigurements, ISIS also came to be known for fixing potholes, installing power lines, administering polio vaccines, and establishing schools, post offices, roving police forces, food kitchens, and even a consumer protection bureau.1 Welfare was an important component of ISIS’s “stateness”2 and was widely viewed as a means by which the organization targeted the hearts and minds of the local population. However, not all militias with territorial aspirations provide public goods. Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) is a case in point. The TTP is the largest jihadi group operating in Pakistan, with the ultimate goal of installing a caliphate. While active mainly in a region where state provision of social services is poorest, the TTP has shown little regard for its inhabitants’ welfare. Surprisingly little of the militia’s inordinate wealth has been allotted to taking care of the local population. Why do some militias provide welfare while others do not?.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Biberman, Y., & Turnbull, M. (2018). When militias provide welfare: Lessons from Pakistan and Nigeria. Political Science Quarterly, 133(4), 695–727. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12832

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free