Multicenter survey on the outcome of transplantation of hematopoietic cells in patients with the complete form of DiGeorge anomaly

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Seventeen patients transplanted with hematopoietic cells to correct severe T lymphocyte immunodeficiency resulting from complete DiGeorge anomaly were identified worldwide, and retrospective data were obtained using a questionnaire-based survey. Patients were treated at a median age of 5 months (range, 2-53 months) between 1995 and 2006. Bone marrow was used in 11 procedures in 9 cases: 6 from matched unrelated donors, 4 from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical siblings, and one haploidentical parent with T-cell depletion. Unmobilized peripheral blood was used in 8 cases: 5 from HLA-identical siblings, one from a matched unrelated donor, one from an HLA-identical parent, and one unrelated matched cord blood. Conditioning was used in 5 patients and graftversus-host disease prophylaxis in 11 patients. Significant graft-versus-host disease occurred in 9 patients, becoming chronic in 3. Median length of follow-up was 13 months, with transplantation from HLA-matched sibling showing the best results. Median survival among deceased patients (10 patients) was 7 months after transplantation (range, 2-18 months). The overall survival rate was 41%, with a median follow-up of 5.8 years (range, 4-11.5 years). Among survivors, median CD3 and CD4 counts were 806 (range, 644-1224) and 348 (range, 225-782) cells/ mm3, respectively, CD4 +/CD45RA+ cells remained very low, whereas mitogen responses were normalized. © 2010 by The American Society of Hematology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Janda, A., Sedlacek, P., Hönig, M., Friedrich, W., Champagne, M., Matsumoto, T., … Gennery, A. R. (2010). Multicenter survey on the outcome of transplantation of hematopoietic cells in patients with the complete form of DiGeorge anomaly. Blood, 116(13), 2229–2236. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-03-275966

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free