Neo-Marxist theories of underdevelopment and development: how relevant are they?

  • Sinha D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper provides a critical review of neo-Marxist theories (dependency and structuralist schools) so far as these two theories are relevant to developing countries. The review brings out a number of strengths and weaknesses of the two schools. The influence of these two schools have declined dramatically in recent years even though these theories have enriched our understanding of the development process to a great extent.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sinha, D. (1998). Neo-Marxist theories of underdevelopment and development: how relevant are they? Indian Journal of Economics, LXXIX(313), 153–162.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free