Neuroethics and disorders of consciousness: Discerning brain states in clinical practice and research

14Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Decisions about end-of-life care and participation in clinical research for patients with disorders of consciousness begin with diagnostic discernment. Accurately distinguishing between brain states clarifies clinicians' ethical obligations and responsibilities. Central to this effort is the obligation to provide neuropalliative care for patients in the minimally conscious state who can perceive pain and to restore functional communication through neuroprosthetics, drugs, and rehabilitation to patients with intact but underactivated neural networks. Efforts to bring scientific advances to patients with disorders of consciousness are reviewed, including the investigational use of deep brain stimulation in patients in the minimally conscious state. These efforts help to affirm the civil rights of a population long on the margins.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fins, J. J. (2016, December 1). Neuroethics and disorders of consciousness: Discerning brain states in clinical practice and research. AMA Journal of Ethics. American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.12.ecas2-1612

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free