A numerical comparison of different methods for determining the particle formation rate

15Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Different methods of determining formation rates of 3 nm particles are compared, basing on analysis of simulated data, but the results are valid for analyses of experimental particle size distribution data as well, at least within the accuracy of the applied model. The study shows that the method of determining formation rates indirectly from measured number concentration data of 3-6 nm particles is generally in good agreement with the theoretical calculation with a systematic error of 0-20%. While this accuracy is often enough, a simple modification to the approximative equation for the formation rate is recommended. A brief study on real atmospheric data implied that in some cases the accuracy gain may be significant. © 2012 Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vuollekoski, H., Sihto, S. L., Kerminen, V. M., Kulmala, M., & Lehtinen, K. E. J. (2012). A numerical comparison of different methods for determining the particle formation rate. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 12(5), 2289–2295. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2289-2012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free