Parliamentary political representation

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the way MPs conceive their representative role at parliaments and it is compared to citizens’ opinion and preferences about the representative political function. It applies the analytical model put forward by Rehfeld (2009, 2011), which distinguishes three dimensions-aims of legislation, source of judgments and responsiveness to sanctions-for empirically observing the normative antithesis between delegate and independent representation. This chapter confirms the existence among the Spanish MPs of four main modes of understanding the political representation: the “Burkean trustees”, the “bureaucrats”, the “volunteers” and the “Madisonian legislators”. The MP’s political party, rather than the parliament where she works, appears as the main determinant of the type of parliamentary representation. This finding is important in order to understand the discrepancy between MPs and the general public as regard the understanding of the representative link.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mota, F. (2017). Parliamentary political representation. In Political Power in Spain: The Multiple Divides between MPs and Citizens (pp. 141–162). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63826-3_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free