Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances

  • Gomes Jr C
  • Lustosa S
  • Matos D
  • et al.
92Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A number of conditions compromise the passage of food along the digestive tract. Nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding is a classic, time-proven technique, although its prolonged use can lead to complications such as lesions to the nasal wing, chronic sinusitis, gastro-oesophageal reflux, and aspiration pneumonia. Another method of infusion, percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy (PEG), is generally used when there is a need for enteral nutrition for a longer time period. There is a high demand for PEG in patients with swallowing disorders, although there is no consistent evidence about its effectiveness and safety as compared to NGT.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gomes Jr, C. A., Lustosa, S. A. S., Matos, D., Andriolo, R. B., Waisberg, D. R., & Waisberg, J. (2010). Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances. In Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd008096.pub2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free