Performance Gaps in Medical Education

  • Rudolph J
  • Simon R
  • Raemer D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The authors present a four-step model of debriefing as formative assessment that blends evidence and theory from education research, the social and cognitive sciences, experience drawn from conducting over 3,000 debriefings, and teaching debriefing to approximately 1,000 clinicians worldwide. The steps are to: 1) note salient performance gaps related to predetermined objectives, 2) provide feedback describing the gap, 3) investigate the basis for the gap by exploring the frames and emotions contributing to the current performance level, and 4) help close the performance gap through discussion or targeted instruction about principles and skills relevant to performance. The authors propose that the model, designed for postsimulation debriefings, can also be applied to bedside teaching in the emergency department (ED) and other clinical settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Raemer, D. B., & Eppich, W. J. (2008). Performance Gaps in Medical Education. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 1010–1016. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18945231

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free