This paper examines recent arguments by Rae Langton and David Lewis intended to prove Humility: the thesis that we have no knowledge of the intrinsic properties of substances. I argue that at best, these arguments are internally incoherent. They at once presuppose a strong version of physicalism according to which physical science is in a position to give a complete list of the fundamental properties of reality, and at the same time various metaphysical principles which in actuality challenge the completeness of the list of properties given by science. Although these arguments are unsound, their consideration enables us to draw important conclusions regarding the tension between the metaphysician's practice of positing intrinsic properties that give colour to the world, and the scientific attempt at giving a complete account of all phenomena.
CITATION STYLE
Ney, A. (2007). Physicalism and our knowledge of intrinsic properties. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 85(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400601154376
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.