Pitfalls of iterative pole mass calculation in electroweak multiplets

6Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The radiatively induced mass splitting between components of an electroweak multiplet is typically of order 100 MeV. This is sufficient to endow the charged components with macroscopically observable lifetimes, and ensure an electrically neutral dark matter particle. We show that a commonly used iterative procedure to compute radiatively corrected pole masses can lead to very different mass splittings than a non-iterative calculation at the same loop order. By estimating the uncertainties of the two one-loop results, we show that the iterative procedure is significantly more sensitive to the choice of renormalisation scale and gauge parameter than the non-iterative method. This can cause the lifetime of the charged component to vary by up to 12 orders of magnitude if iteration is employed. We show that individual pole masses exhibit similar scale-dependence regardless of the procedure, but that the leading scale-dependent terms cancel when computing the mass splitting if and only if the non-iterative procedure is employed. We show that this behaviour persists at two-loop order: the precision of the mass splitting improves in the non-iterative approach, but our results suggest that higher-order corrections do not reduce the uncertainty in the iterative calculation enough to resolve the problem at two-loop order. We conclude that the iterative procedure should not be used for computing pole masses in situations where electroweak mass splittings are phenomenologically relevant.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McKay, J., Scott, P., & Athron, P. (2018). Pitfalls of iterative pole mass calculation in electroweak multiplets. European Physical Journal Plus, 133(10). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2018-12250-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free