On the possibility of constructive neutral evolution

356Citations
Citations of this article
300Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The neutral theory often is presented as a theory of 'noise' or silent changes at an isolated 'molecular level,' relevant to marking the steady pace of divergence, but not to the origin of biological structure, function, or complexity. Nevertheless, precisely these issues can be addressed in neutral models, such as those elaborated here with regard to scrambled ciliate genes, gRNA-mediated RNA editing, the transition from self-splicing to spliceosomal splicing, and the retention of duplicate genes. All of these are instances of a more general scheme of 'constructive neutral evolution' that invokes biased variation, epistatic interactions, and excess capacities to account for a complex series of steps giving rise to novel structures or operations. The directional and constructive outcomes of these models are due not to neutral allele fixations per se, but to these other factors. Neutral models of this type may help to clarify the poorly understood role of nonselective factors in evolutionary innovation and directionality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stoltzfus, A. (1999). On the possibility of constructive neutral evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 49(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006540

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free