A Pragmatic Explanation of the Stage Level/ Individual Level Contrast in Combination with Locatives

  • Maienborn C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One important difference between stage level predicates (SLPs) and individual level predicates (ILPs) is their behavior with respect to locative modifiers. It is commonly assumed that SLPs but not ILPs combine with locatives. The present study argues against a semantic account for this behavior (as advanced by e.g. Kratzer 1995, Chierchia 1995) and proposes a genuinely pragmatic explanation of the observed stage level/individual level contrast instead. The proposal is spelled out using Blutner's (1998, 2000) optimal-ity theoretic version of the Gricean maxims. Building on the observation that the respective locatives are not event-related but frame-setting modifiers, the preference for main predicates that express temporary properties is explained as a side-effect of " syn-chronizing " the main predicate with the locative frame in the course of finding an optimal interpretation. By emphasizing the division of labor between grammar and pragmatics, the proposed solution takes a considerable load off of semantics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maienborn, C. (2004). A Pragmatic Explanation of the Stage Level/ Individual Level Contrast in Combination with Locatives, 15, 158–170.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free