Presidentialism, parliamentarism, and democracy

399Citations
Citations of this article
369Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This book addresses the following question: why are presidential democracies more likely to break down than parliamentary ones? Conventional wisdom among political scientists pointS to the incentives generated by the form of government itself; the independence of the executive and legislature that defines presidentialism generates incentives that are not conducive to the consolidation of democracy. On the basis of a data set that covers all democracies between 1946 and 2002, this book demonstrates that this is not the case: the incentives generated by presidentialism are as conducive to the consolidation of democracy as the ones generated by parliamentarism. The book argues that what kills presidentialism is the fact that it exists in countries where democracies of any type are not likely to survive. This book will be of interest to academic researchers, graduates and advanced undergraduates enrolled in courses on comparative politics and political economy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheibub, J. A. (2006). Presidentialism, parliamentarism, and democracy. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy (pp. 1–206). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813344

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free