Priority and particle physics: Ontic structural realism as a fundamentality thesis

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article, I address concerns that the ontological priority claims definitive of ontic structural realism are as they stand unclear, and I do so by placing these claims on a more rigorous formal footing than they typically have been hitherto. I first of all argue that Kit Fine's analysis of ontological dependence furnishes us with an ontological priority relation that is particularly apt for structuralism. With that in place, and with reference to two case studies prominent within the structuralist literature, I consider whether any of structuralism's distinctive priority claims may be regarded as warranted. The discussion as a whole has largely negative implications for the radical structuralism of French and Ladyman (including their 'eliminativist' interpretation of it), largely positive implications for the moderate structuralism primarily advocated by Esfeld and Lam, and some broad lessons for contemporary fundamentalist metaphysics as a whole. © 2013 The Author .

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McKenzie, K. (2014). Priority and particle physics: Ontic structural realism as a fundamentality thesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 65(2), 353–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axt017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free