Probability in the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Abstract

It is argued that, although in the Many-Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics there is no “probability” for an outcome of a quantum experiment in the usual sense, we can understand why we have an illusion of probability. The explanation involves: (a) A “sleeping pill” gedanken experiment which makes correspondence between an illegitimate question: “What is the probability of an outcome of a quantum measurement?” with a legitimate question: “What is the probability that ‘I’ am in the world corresponding to that outcome?”; (b) A gedanken experiment which splits the world into several worlds which are identical according to some symmetry condition; and (c) Relativistic causality, which together with (b) explain the Born rule of standard quantum mechanics. The Quantum Sleeping Beauty controversy and “caring measure” replacing probability measure are discussed.