The Problem With "Problems": The Case of Openings in Optometry Consultations

13Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article contributes to conversation analytic understanding of openings in health-care consultations. It focuses on the case of optometry: a form of health-care practice in which an optometrist conducts checks of a patient's vision and eye health. Patients are advised to attend regularly for routine assessments and can also request a specific appointment at any time. Analysis of a corpus of 66 consultations shows what happens when the optometrist's opening question solicits the client's "problems" with their eyes. We find three types of patient response. Patients who have requested a specific appointment (most often) report a problem with their eyes and establish a problem-purpose encounter. Patients attending for a routinely timed appointment either report no problems and establish a routine-assessment purpose, or if they do have a problem, they delay reporting it or downplay it. We track through what happens subsequently. The findings have practical implications for diagnosis and treatment. © 2013 Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Webb, H., vom Lehn, D., Heath, C., Gibson, W., & Evans, B. J. W. (2013). The Problem With “Problems”: The Case of Openings in Optometry Consultations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.753724

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free