Proportional reasoning, framing effects, and affirmative action: Is six of one really half a dozen of another in university admissions?

9Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

People often reason proportionally, perceiving fixed outcomes as larger or smaller depending upon the reference condition. Thus, for policies affecting individuals, presenting data as percentages rather than frequencies can alter perceived effects on high versus low base rate group members, even though identical numbers of individuals in each group are affected. Such numerical framing effects were explored through a case analysis of public debates over race-conscious selection policies and through experimental manipulations employing a race-conscious university admissions scenario. Undergraduates (N = 193) received data reporting the expected impact on black and white student enrollment resulting from a university shift to race-neutral admissions. Compared to those encountering percentages or proportions, participants receiving identical information expressed as frequencies revealed a predicted greater preference for race-neutral or "race blind" admissions. Structural equation analysis supported a model in which perceived impact and fairness mediated the relationship between format and endorsement of race-neutral admissions. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Friedrich, J., Lucas, G., & Hodell, E. (2005). Proportional reasoning, framing effects, and affirmative action: Is six of one really half a dozen of another in university admissions? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.06.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free