The Psychology of Eyewitness Testimony: A Comparison of Experts and Prospective Jurors

49Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To compare people's beliefs about eyewitness testimony with expert opinion, 79 college students and community adults filled out a questionnaire in which they reported whether they agreed or disagreed with 21 statements previously used in a survey of eyewitness experts (Kassin, Ellsworth, & Smith, 1989). The results indicated that there was a significant inter‐item correlation of agreement rates but that subjects differed from the experts on 15 of these items. For courts seeking to determine the extent to which juries need assistance in their evaluations of eyewitness evidence, these findings offer a tentative list of topics worthy of either expert testimony or cautionary instructions from the judge. Copyright © 1992, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kassin, S. M., & Barndollar, K. A. (1992). The Psychology of Eyewitness Testimony: A Comparison of Experts and Prospective Jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(16), 1241–1249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00948.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free