Random drift versus selection in academic vocabulary: An evolutionary analysis of published keywords

34Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The evolution of vocabulary in academic publishing is characterized via keyword frequencies recorded in the ISI Web of Science citations database. In four distinct case-studies, evolutionary analysis of keyword frequency change through time is compared to a model of random copying used as the null hypothesis, such that selection may be identified against it. The case studies from the physical sciences indicate greater selection in keyword choice than in the social sciences. Similar evolutionary analyses can be applied to a wide range of phenomena; wherever the popularity of multiple items through time has been recorded, as with web searches, or sales of popular music and books, for example. © 2008 Bentley.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bentley, R. A. (2008). Random drift versus selection in academic vocabulary: An evolutionary analysis of published keywords. PLoS ONE, 3(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003057

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free