Redundant elements in SNOMED CT concept definitions

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

While redundant elements in SNOMED CT concept definitions are harmless from a logical point of view, they unnecessarily make concept definitions of typically large ontologies such as SNOMED CT hard to construct and to maintain. In this paper, we apply a fully automated method to detect intra-axiom redundancies in SNOMED CT. We systematically analyse the completeness and soundness of the results of our method by examining the identified redundant elements. In absence of a gold standard, we check whether our method identifies concepts that are likely to contain redundant elements because they become equivalent to their stated subsumer when they are replaced by a fully defined concept with the same definition. To evaluate soundness, we remove all identified redundancies, and test whether the logical closure is preserved by comparing the concept hierarchy to the one of the official SNOMED CT distribution. We found that 35,010 of the 296,433 SNOMED CT concepts (12%) contain redundant elements in their definitions, and that the results of our method are sound and complete with respect to our partial evaluation. We recommend to free the stated form from these redundancies. In future, knowledge modellers should be supported by being pointed to newly introduced redundancies. © 2013 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dentler, K., & Cornet, R. (2013). Redundant elements in SNOMED CT concept definitions. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7885 LNAI, pp. 186–195). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38326-7_29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free