Replacing separate entity accounting and the arm's length principle with formulary apportionment

  • Charles Jr. E
ISSN: 00074624
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Because of well-known difficulties encountered in implementing separate entity accounting and the arm's length principle (SA/ALP), some have suggested that formulary apportionment (FA) should replace that approach as the international standard for measuring the income of multinational corporations. FA would sidestep the difficult problems of economic interdependence and transfer pricing which plague SA/ALP. It applied to corporate groups, FA would render tax havens ineffective. However, FA is not without problems. FA does not attempt to determine precisely where income originates, as the methodology based on SA/ALP purports to do; rather, it uses a formula to attribute income to various jurisdictions. FA has no clear theoretical foundation and is inherently arbitrary. Not to be underestimated are the political and administrative problems of shifting to a new system based on FA from the one based on SA/ALP that has been the international standard for at least 75 years.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Charles Jr., E. M. (2002). Replacing separate entity accounting and the arm’s length principle with formulary apportionment. Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation, 56(12), 586. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=251898481&Fmt=7&clientId=25620&RQT=309&VName=PQD

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free