Retention of riveted aluminum leg bands by wild Turkeys

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In order for mark–recapture models to provide unbiased estimates of population parameters, it is critical that uniquely identifying tags or marks are not lost. We double-banded male and female wild turkeys with aluminum rivet bands and estimated the probability that a bird would be recovered with both bands < 1–225 wk since banding (mean = 51.2 wk, SD = 44.0). We found that 100% of females (n = 37) were recovered with both bands. For males, we recovered 6 of 188 turkeys missing a rivet band for a retention probability of 0.984 (95% CI = 0.96–0.99). If male turkeys are doublebanded with rivet bands the probability of recovering a turkey without any marks is < 0.001. We failed to detect a change in band retention over time or differences between adults and juveniles. Given the low cost and high retention rates of rivet aluminum bands, we believe they are an effective marking technique for wild turkeys and, for most studies, will minimize any concern about the assumption that marks are not lost.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diefenbach, D. R., Vreeland, W. C., Casalena, M. J., & Schiavone, M. V. (2016, June 1). Retention of riveted aluminum leg bands by wild Turkeys. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. https://doi.org/10.3996/072015-JFWM-064

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free