Rethinking the Meaning and Management of Intersexuality

65Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Given that ample research has established that surgery to ‘correct’ the appearance of intersexed genitals is socially motivated, this article is concerned how actual medical practices obfuscate social interests, and what the results of that obfuscation can be. By applying Eric Parens' distinctive means of categorizing medical procedures as either ‘enhancements’ or ‘treatments’ this article argues that the current means of managing intersexuality fit neither category. The article then proceeds to question the logic of dominant medical practice concerned with intersexuality and proposes new ways to think about intersexuality and provide care for intersexed children. Case studies form exemplars that demonstrate the consequences of the medical and cultural illogic at work in early childhood diagnosis and clinical management. © 2002, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holmes, M. (2002). Rethinking the Meaning and Management of Intersexuality. Sexualities, 5(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460702005002002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free