Retributivism is often explicitly or implicitly assumed to be compatible with the harm principle, since the harm principle (in some guises) concerns the content of the criminal law, while retributivism concerns the punishment of those that break the law. In this essay I show that retributivism should not be endorsed alongside any version of the harm principle. In fact, retributivists should reject all attempts to see the criminal law only through (other) person-affecting concepts or "grievance" morality, since they should endorse the criminalization of conduct that is either purely self-harming or good for somebody and bad for nobody (i.e., Pareto improvements). © 2014 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
Tomlin, P. (2014). Retributivists! the harm principle is not for you! Ethics, 124(2), 272–298. https://doi.org/10.1086/673437
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.