Retroactive interference and mental practice effects on motor performance: A pilot study

2Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study examined the effect of similar versus dissimilar retroactive interference on the mental practice effects for performing a novel motor skill. Research has shown that mental practice of a motor task can interfere with learning and performance of the task; however, little is known about how different retroactive interference activities affect mental practice effects. 90 volunteers ages 18 to 51 years (M = 26.8, SD = 9.6) completed a pre-test and post-test of 10 sets of five trials of a throwing task with the non-preferred hand. In the practice phase, participants mentally practiced the throwing task and then mentally practiced a task that was similar, dissimilar, or completed an unrelated reading task. Performance for all groups improved from pre- to post-test; however, there were no differences in increases for the three groups. The findings suggest that mental practice of similar and dissimilar tasks produced no significant interference in performance. © Perceptual and Motor Skills 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kremer, P., Spittle, M., & Malseed, S. (2011). Retroactive interference and mental practice effects on motor performance: A pilot study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 113(3), 805–814. https://doi.org/10.2466/05.11.23.PMS.113.6.815-814

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free