Role Functionalism and Epiphenomenalism

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The type-type reductive identity of the mental to the physical was once the dominant position in the mental causation debate. In time this consensus was overturned, largely due to its inability to handle the problem of multiple realizability. In its place a nonreductive position emerged which often included an adherence to functionalism. Functionalism construes mental properties as functional states of an organism, which in turn have specific physical realizers. This nonreductive form of functionalism, henceforth called role functionalism, has faced a number of criticisms itself. Chief among these is the concern that the realizer of the functional role is causally sufficient, so the role property does not make a contribution of its own. In this paper I argue that there is a way for unreduced functional properties to play a role after all. This is done by conceiving of functional properties as higher level functional properties of a macro system which determine that its realizers will play the roles that they play. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moore, D. (2011). Role Functionalism and Epiphenomenalism. Philosophia, 39(3), 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-011-9302-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free