John McDowell has suggested recently that there is a route from his favoured solution to Kripke's Wittgenstein's “sceptical paradox” about rule‐following to a particular form of cognitive externalism. In this paper, 1 argue that this is not the case: even granting McDowell his solution to the rule‐following paradox, his preferred version of cognitive externalism does not follow.
CITATION STYLE
MILLER, A. (2004). Rule‐Following and Externalism*. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 68(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00329.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.